My ID model is taken from the ADDIE model done in a circular motion, showing the importance of the ANALYSIS step, where the environment of the organization is analyzed and the gap if there is one is found. The Environment and the gap is shown in my model as having a great influence in all the steps of my model. Formative summary (FS) is also shown with the circle shapes that can be done before and after each step. It is in a circular mode because I envisioned my model as "adaptive" that can be revisited every 5-10 years as each generation of workers change---the culture and environment might change as well and an analysis of the organization and its environment will be needed again (if ever there is a problem-gap). My model is very "environment conscious" because I see the government organization (my work place anyway...)as very different from the private sector. Relationships between workers are very important and people are quite sensitive to change (as you can see, I have been analyzing the environment of organization already haha)
I hope I will be done with my paper in 2 weeks!
Ryan, you have created a very nice model here. I like how the ring and circular arrow connects everything together. Plus the importance of formative assessment is emphasized well. IS there room in this model for more detail on what will be done in each area? For example what will be analyzed in the environment that makes your model specific for training purposes in a government organization?
ReplyDeleteI love you graphical design. Our models are similar in the thinking of how formative and summative evaluation play a role in the design and development stages. I am a bit confused as to why there is an arrow pointing to a gap during the implementation phase?
ReplyDelete